Reviews
Fits: KAWASAKI ZX-4RR, KAWASAKI Ninja ZX-25R, KAWASAKI Ninja ZX-25R SE, KAWASAKI ZX-4R SE
Not possible to share with 250.
However, the Swing Arm and Rear tire interfere with each other because the Tire is one size thicker than the 250 and the Chain is 2 links shorter than the 250. I tried to solve this problem by setting two small Driven Sprockets, but still only 2mm of Clearance was secured.
In addition, the vehicle height has been raised by about 1 cm at the license plate position, and the vehicle body tilt has become much larger when the side stand is set up.
It was disappointing because this is an expensive product and this should have been mentioned in the product description beforehand.
View detail
Nice but catastrophic malfunction
I really enjoyed this swingarm for about 600 miles. Came out one day and there was this visible crack in the swing from a distance because you have to admire a moto with the new parts every time you exit the house and also to check the tire pressure, ect. I believe it was a one off from the MFG and did not dispute a claim based on being in the US and having to pay all the shipping fees back. Takegawa is great quality parts, I have many more of their parts on multiple bikes but I do believe there was a mistake on this production and or specific swingarm. Spacing was near perfect, torque was on point, something just went wrong. View detail
![Aluminum Swingarm Type G [Disc Type] for APE](https://global.webike-cdn.net/photo/article/37/1444656588037L.jpg)
Cospa is okay, is quality a step further?
The price is overwhelmingly cheaper compared with the famous products of other companies (Originally this price is reasonable?) is.
Adjusting the tension of the Chain When attaching the Slider for Axle Shaft, the processing accuracy of one Side was poor, and as it was, it was in a state where it was Large and not addictive.
Aluminum Why did you deal with it by cutting gorigor with File at hand, but you can not find it even if you temporarily construct it when you inspect it?
Without it it was disappointing that the evaluation was ☆ 4 ranked.
Let's expect improvement of Manufacturer.
View detail